AM MODES
Base for all AM + DetexLine Magnum
Sensormatic smart v.2012
Sensormatic UltraExit v.2018
CrossPoint v.2021
Sensormatic UltraExit v.2020
Synergy 1
Synergy 2
Synergy 3
Synergy 4
Dexilon + Synergy (added in late 2021)
AM SUPPRESSION EVOLUTION HISTORY
Early jammers operated on the fundamental principle of total frequency jamming at 58kHz; this became Mode #1 in the AM jammer, but with several of our HIGHLY CRITICAL modifications.
This mode allows jamming of most old AM gate models and some new ones whose developers didn't bother much with protection or noise reduction systems. (Based on extensive testing as of 2021, it is highly effective for most Sensormatic UltraExit units with standard settings and DetexLine Magnum systems).
Why were the other modes created?
- This method caused issues with some models that would freeze with a continuous sound due to such impact.
- In an attempt to adapt to the jammer noise, the gates began producing unwanted sound reactions.
- Gates could freeze so badly that nothing helped except unplugging them from the power outlet.
All these moments drew unwanted attention when visiting the same store frequently.
There weren't many of these cases, and we tolerated this problem until nearly 2012, eventually leading to the creation of Mode #2.
At the time, we called it SMART, as it mathematically handled nuances like freezes and unnecessary reactions from Sensormatic models ranging from the oldest to the UltraExit with a metal detector.
Near 2014, an updated UltraExit model appeared with a iron pedestal base, equipped with different features and options, and our mode was no longer as effective. As a result, Mode #3 was born.
However, this even more precise mode turned out to be "weak" for older systems, and sometimes jamming simply didn't happen... A dilemma emerged, let me remind you:
at that time, jammers were just a simple box with a switch; no multi-mode functionality had been required before. The 1st mode was replaced by the 2nd in a black box.
Suddenly, AT LEAST TWO MODES were required SIMULTANEOUSLY.
We began experimenting, and by 2015 we reached dual-mode capability; by early 2016, we moved to 8-mode versions to study our hypotheses.
I won't go into detail about the 8-mode version; these were transitional experiments without which large-scale testing by our trusted users (friends, colleagues, and simple enthusiasts) would have been impossible.
One of those 8 modes later became Mode #4, as during that period, the protective AM technology of CrossPoint was defeated. When it appeared in 2014, it created a protection level that was absolutely impenetrable for jammers.
We ended up with 4 modes that couldn't be discarded. WHAT COULD WE DO? Understand this: we could do nothing else but write all of this down... As you can see in the current version, we have arranged the modes in the chronological order in which the emerging PROBLEMS were solved.
The year 2018 brought us even more precise knowledge, and with a new mode, we solved a significant problem with Russian Magnum gates from DetexLine using non-standard settings (rarely encountered). Simultaneously, this mode became the solution for a small portion of UltraExit units that still reacted to modes 1, 2, and 3. We decided not to delete the previous Mode #3 but to leave it in its place, as it remains quite applicable in other countries.
In that same year, 2018, we began solving the problem of the newest AM gates from Sensormatic—the Synergy model. As a partial solution, Mode #6 was created; not yet perfect, but already helping users live with fewer restrictions. At the end of summer 2020, we created three more special modes for Synergy: #7, 8, and 9...
Why three at once? Sensormatic put in the effort; these gates are highly technological. Without getting into technicalities, they were initially declared "unbeatable" for jammers.
After testing in various regions of the planet, #7 showed the best results as we expected, but 8 and 9 often help when 7 causes remote reactions.
Additional Duplicated Answer to the question "Why are there 4 Synergy modes?"
First, you need to know that the original Mode #6 did not provide a complete victory, only partially solving the problem that Sensormatic intensified with the 2018 firmware. In some locations, Mode #6 gave a clearly effective result compared to modes 1-5, but not everywhere.
Ultimately, having accumulated knowledge, experience, and information about the operation of these systems and the new firmware that constantly changes signal analysis algorithms (it changes very fast—imagine there's an entire computer inside the gates that changes gate behavior at any suspicious event), we arrived in Moscow, where the maximum number of such systems was installed, and began defeating them anew.
As a result, about 5 different methods emerged, which still did not give a single result for all Synergy units at once.
We added the 3 best ones to the list: 7, 8, and 9. Statistically, #7 gave results in more locations; in others, modes 8 and 9 helped.
Mode #6 was kept for those who are already used to using it in places where it remains effective.
So, if you see Synergy:
Turn on Mode #1 and walk near the entrance (??? - yes, it works where there are no special settings). If a remote gate reaction occurs:
Turn on Mode #7 and walk near them again. If there is no sound, enter the store with AM tags.
If reactions still occur, try modes 9, 10, 8, or 6.
Please treat this situation with understanding. Sensormatic created a nearly perfect system, and defeating it even partially seemed like an incredible task. Perhaps one day we will find a better solution in a single mode, but we cannot promise that.
At this point, I must answer one of the most popular questions:
"Is it possible to apply modes designed for modern gates to older models?"
— Yes, undoubtedly it is possible, and it is often effective.
BUT!!! Make the decision yourself, keeping in mind the fact that a precision electronic screwdriver (modes 6-9) cannot always replace a primitive caveman's club, which is what modes 1 and 2 represent.
For most older Sensormatic models, Mode #3 is suitable, but Mode #1 and #2 remain statistically more effective.
Some older models may cause issues for you because of their power, which was reduced in later models in favor of precision and lower energy consumption due to improved user characteristics, such as—I repeat—lower energy costs, more options, and more stable adaptation to interference via software filtering.
ALL OF THIS ALLOWS US TO MAINTAIN JAMMING EFFECTIVENESS AT THE LEVEL OF 15 YEARS AGO.
It is difficult for you to understand this now, but the world has become incredibly complex. If it weren't for the multi-year work of my team, you would be in danger using only Mode #1 at a power level 6 times lower and without certain minor modifications we implemented during hundreds and hundreds of crazy experiments INTO THIS base Mode #1.
Without this massive amount of work, no one would still believe in the functionality of AM technology jammers.
And all these "MANY WORDS" are so you understand that you won't succeed if you don't start learning to distinguish an old Opel from a fresh BMW.