RF MODES
CheckPoint + new NEDAP
Main / Universal
NEDAP
NEDAP+
CROSSPOINT 2026
Experimental v.2021
Blue Stripe v.2023
Lucatron
DETAILED MODE DESCRIPTION
— Effective for the majority of Chinese-made gates.
— Effective for some of the newest NEDAP models; no guarantees yet as they are still being studied, but statistics show Mode 1 is effective.
This setting is used when at least four frames are installed in a store. It is not frequently encountered; the probability of meeting such a setup is extremely low. In Russia, it is found in Sportmaster.
How to detect if this specific mode is needed?
— When passing through the gates, adjacent or distant frames may trigger, or they may react from a distance.
A high level of universality was also identified for this mode with many other RF systems, excluding only NEDAP and GateWay.
There is a probability that the method used in this mode will work for the latest Checkpoint NEO systems, but statistics are currently insufficient to declare victory over them.
**We never rush to replace Mode #1 with another method until the new one is time-tested.**
*Since Mode #2 was our achievement in 2021, we tried to evolve that concept by re-studying everything, which definitely helps in situations where other modes fail.
Compatibility with other manufacturers' gates has not been verified; it is likely effective for many gates excluding NEDAP.
ARRANGEMENT LOGIC
Why are the modes arranged in this order? How does it differ from the chronological arrangement in AM?
The previous version of our jammer lacked smartphone screen control, used only vibration for indication, and could not jump from Mode #2 directly to Mode #7.
Mode #2 was taken as the foundation, as it provided unique results for its time. Modes were placed around it specifically to ensure operational speed in your decision-making. Here is the logic:
- If Mode 2 does not work, you are most likely facing either a NEDAP system or something Chinese. You only need to take one action to solve the problem.
- If that fails and the system is NEDAP, then Mode #4 will solve your problem.
Other modes were placed further down the list because CROSSPOINT, Lucatron Venus, and Russian "Blue Stripe" gates differ significantly visually and are easy to identify at a glance.
The entire logic was felt when using the previous generation of the 2-in-1 jammer (which is not obsolete and still has its place). Believe us, we designed this based on real experience in real-world conditions.
RF TECHNOLOGY EVOLUTION HISTORY
If you're interested, I'll briefly explain how everything evolved and the events surrounding the development of RF jammer technology.
In the beginning, long before public sales, our RF jammers had only one mode. It remains first on the list because it is the base method, which we have naturally modified and improved, though the principle remains the same.
This mode showed certain effectiveness against Checkpoint, Amersec systems, some old Gateway models, various RF systems made with metal pipe frames, and many other devices.
WHY DIDN'T WE SELL THIS EARLIER?
At that time, there was a problem that prevented us from releasing the RF jammer for open sale until 2018.
The invention and first experiments began in 2013. For five years, we protected users from purchasing equipment that was not yet ready for high-efficiency operation and predictable reliability.
Only after we decoded the algorithms of Nedap systems—which were "impenetrable" for the first mode—and once we studied the specifics of certain Chinese systems, did we release the jammer to the market.
At that time, it had five modes:
- First Mode was base.
- Second — our first specialized mode for Nedap.
- Third — experimental mode for the same system.
- Fourth — intended for Russian Detex Line and Gateway antennas.
- Fifth Mode — created for rare systems; its goal was primarily our further experimentation to understand how to defeat the protection technology as a whole.
SEARCHING FOR THE "GOLDEN KEY"
Our main goal has always been searching for a universal "key" to the entire technology—the very vulnerability we are still looking for. We do not give up: after creating one thing, we constantly return to development and improvement with new ideas, strength, and knowledge.
This is evident in our refusal to release the technology to the public during the first five years and its subsequent multi-stage perfection.
Currently, we are in the eighth major stage of improving RF suppression technology. These are not empty words: these are eight of our large-scale attempts to completely overcome protection, rethink the operation of each mode, and revisit all our ideas to create something new.
And every time, we achieved something; every time, we secured another victory.
There is a high probability that if this equipment remains in demand, we will continue to improve it. New attempts will be made to find that "magic key" that will allow for the creation of the simplest possible device operating on the principle: "SWITCH ON — AND 100% RESULT."